{"id":13489,"date":"2017-02-20T07:32:57","date_gmt":"2017-02-20T12:32:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/grockit.com\/gmat\/?p=1186"},"modified":"2020-09-11T20:42:25","modified_gmt":"2020-09-11T20:42:25","slug":"gmat-verbal-study-plan-for-non-native-speakers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wpapp.kaptest.com\/study\/gmat\/gmat-verbal-study-plan-for-non-native-speakers\/","title":{"rendered":"GMAT Verbal Study Plan for Non-Native Speakers"},"content":{"rendered":"

By far<\/strong>, the easiest and fastest way to learn English is to be a tiny baby growing up in an English-speaking environment. If you are reading this article, though, you are no longer in a position to take advantage of that opportunity, and will have to improve your English the hard way: practice. Not all practice is equally good, however! English, like all living languages, is complex and constantly-changing; what is acceptable in spoken English is not always accepted in Standard (written) English. The key to improving your English reading, processing, and writing skills for the GMAT is consistent high-quality practice. It’s true that native speakers have a big advantage — they have typically been listening to correct English for at least two decades. Non-native speakers, however, have a small advantage — they (unlike native speakers) have not been listening to incorrect<\/strong> English for two decades. Build your study around quality writing and daily practice — and start as early as you can.
\n 
\n

What to Read<\/h3>
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\nThe New Yorker<\/a>,\u00a0<\/em>The Economist<\/a>,\u00a0<\/em>Harper’s Magazine<\/a>, <\/em>and\u00a0<\/em>The Atlantic<\/a>\u00a0<\/em>all offer quality writing that can be used in your studies.
\nA note about The Economist<\/em> in particular: you may be tempted to choose that above all the others, as it is the most business- and world news-focused. However, this would be a mistake.\u00a0The Economist<\/em> is known for its very precise and concise use of language; you all should be reading it for this reason. On the other hand, The Economist<\/em> assumes a very high level of familiarity and comfort with not only standard language usage, but also the rarer, more complex, and more concise usage of English found more commonly in the humanities (it also occasionally chooses British English usage over American English usage). The other three periodicals mentioned above have a smaller portion of their content devoted to finance and business and a greater portion devoted to the humanities — often without The Economist’s<\/em> trademark concision. You will get more practice tracking longer English sentences, which can also shed more light on English usage: sometimes things are easier to understand when more words are used to explain. In addition, the greater variety present in the other periodicals prepares you better for the variety of topics you’ll get in GMAT Reading Comprehension passages. In short: use The Economist<\/em>, but not only The Economist<\/em>.
\n 
\n

One Year Away From Test Day<\/h3>
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n
    \n